RE: Evidence for God being "a superior being" ?
June 11, 2010 at 3:38 pm
(This post was last modified: June 11, 2010 at 3:38 pm by fr0d0.)
(June 11, 2010 at 3:09 pm)Caecilian Wrote:So no refutation then.
As far as I can tell, this is gibberish. I really have no idea at all what most of this is supposed to mean, if anything.
But then, on reflection, the whole concept of omnipotence may be gibberish too. Perhaps any definition of omnipotence turns out to be self-contradictory.
Let me try again, as I don't believe you're being deliberately dense.
If we had an unlimited power source - say electrical. What would that mean logically? Maybe we assume 1. It won't run out & 2. it's has infinite force.
What's missing using the descriptor 'unlimited'?
Yep... lack of force & of limited duration.
So to frame this in parallel with your dismissal of omnipotence: this unlimited force is not unlimited because it isn't the opposite of unlimited.
Is that clearer?