Evidence for God being "a superior being" ?

[Caecilian]

---

So can God act against his nature?

Why is anything we work out bound by our logical construct? Answer: because that's what makes sense to us. We can't conclude the illogical, unless that is our intention.

God isn't 'bound' by anything. He is omnipotent. You're saying that he isn't omnipotent because he can't act in an anti omnipotent way. Or something can't be 'something' because it can't be nothing as well as something.

<edit>
I just noticed your edit tav - same answer.

I can't quite believe the absurd strawmen you keep building.

---

The same old fr0d0 arguments. We've been here before, I think.

Omnibenevolence and omnipotence are 2 seperable qualities. Theres nothing to say that an omnipotent being would necessarily be good. Or that a purely good being would be omnipotent.

It follows from this that god's status as a 'positive being' has nothing to do with his being an 'all-powerful being'. The 2 statements refer to quite different properties.

If a being actually is omnipotent, then it can do anything that is logically possible for a being to do. This includes doing bad stuff.

However, your definition of god as a 'positive entity' precludes him from doing bad stuff.

Thus no 'positive entity' as you define it could possibly be omnipotent.

Your model of god is incoherent.

Clear?