Darwin's theory is true as much as Newton's laws of motion are. That is to say, they're not. We know Newton's laws can only make accurate predictions with light objects moving at small speeds. Darwin's theory doesn't mention anything about genes or mutations because there were no such concepts at the time (or, if there were, he didn't even consider them). The theory of evolution we have now is different than Darwin's.
We know enough about dark matter and energy, as well as cosmic rays, to know that they don't affect anything on Earth. Supernatural concepts are BS, as they have no evidence for their existence. They're not "mysterious unknowns" because they don't exist.
I have no idea what the last sentence of your post means.
We know enough about dark matter and energy, as well as cosmic rays, to know that they don't affect anything on Earth. Supernatural concepts are BS, as they have no evidence for their existence. They're not "mysterious unknowns" because they don't exist.
I have no idea what the last sentence of your post means.
The truth is absolute. Life forms are specks of specks (...) of specks of dust in the universe.
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
![[Image: LB_Header_Idea_A.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i280.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fkk172%2FBlaziken_rjcf%2FLB_Header_Idea_A.jpg)
Why settle for normal, when you can be so much more? Why settle for something, when you can have everything?
