Darwin Proven Wrong?

[Cato]

According to Neil deGrasse Tyson, "dark matter" and "dark energy" could just as well be called "without a clue A" and "without a clue B."
http://www.haydenplanetarium.org/tyson/w...ark-energy

You are demonstrating a habit of not understanding NDT. All he is saying is that we know it exists. We see its effects, but we don't yet know what it is. This is what science does, and off we go to discover what dark matter and dark energy are.

You invoking dark matter and dark energy and their contributions to universal matter and energy as an attempt to nullify confidence in what we do know is disingenuous. Perhaps you would do well to review this article about belief from the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Pay particular attention to the section rearding belief and knowledge and what justified true belief means.

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/belief/