RE: Are We Living In God's "Matrix"?
September 11, 2014 at 3:29 pm
(This post was last modified: September 11, 2014 at 3:34 pm by sswhateverlove.)
(September 11, 2014 at 3:15 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: Mod Hat On:
OP, your strawmen constitutes trolling, which is against the rules. Please acknowledge that you understand that atheism and agnosticism are not mutually exclusive, or risk disciplinary action.
Mod Hat Off
We do not take kindly to people telling us what we believe, and then sticking their fingers in their ears when we correct them.
I have acknowledged that numerous times. Can we now discuss the scientific observations I'm referring to?
(September 11, 2014 at 3:12 pm)sswhateverlove Wrote:(September 11, 2014 at 2:24 pm)Cato Wrote: The correct figure that NDT cites is 7%. And it's belief in a personal god, not intelligent design. You are also confused about what NDT's messages are.
Your post indicates that you are stripping this misinformation from a secondary (likely ID) source. Here's the video. You watch and tell me if you still hold to the 25% and if anything NDT says supports your above claim.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5xvILvxYbFA
By the way, this is what is called providing evidence.
This is what I was referring to... I am reviewing it to check my statistics, I could be wrong, but I do know I'm getting his message correct.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ASmQmYX-71Q
I stand corrected, the statistic is actually 15%, not 25%. The part I'm referring to starts at 12:30
(September 11, 2014 at 3:09 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:(September 11, 2014 at 3:07 pm)sswhateverlove Wrote: MY rigid position? I've simply been pointing out that much of what the scientific community and public opinion thought to be "truth" is now being challenged by new scientific revelations. As a result, I'm saying my opinion is that it's worth reconsidering what was previously considered possible or impossible with regard to the nature of reality. How is that rigid?
Heyguesswhat that's how science works, and the more evidence that is uncovered, the more our ideas will change. Still don't know why the hell you brought atheism into the discussion at all.
Because I'm interested in how certain revelations influence the atheist perspective. Am I not allow to wonder that?