(September 11, 2014 at 3:29 pm)sswhateverlove Wrote: This is what I was referring to... I am reviewing it to check my statistics, I could be wrong, but I do know I'm getting his message correct.
I stand corrected, the statistic is actually 15%, not 25%. The part I'm referring to starts at 12:30
You are misrepresenting what is being said:
1. The percent references the number of members of the National Academy of Science that believe in a personal god. This says absolutely nothing about intelligent design, which was your claim. Flatly disingenuous.
2. NDT is not providing the statistic to demonstrate the validity of god claims. His point is to stress that a solution to the religion problem is not simply a matter of more science education for the general public.