RE: Why was Adam exempt from the transgression when the transgression was disobedience?
September 12, 2014 at 10:13 am
(This post was last modified: September 12, 2014 at 10:14 am by Greatest I am.)
(September 12, 2014 at 9:51 am)Drich Wrote:(September 11, 2014 at 12:40 am)Esquilax Wrote: Which should, by the logic Drich just presented, preclude god from teaching, making the new testament sinful...
But please do spin around and give us the usual "spiritual death" nonsense, Drich. I'm sure we'll all ignore that it isn't present in the text at all!
Adam and Eve before the fall were immortal. Once the ate the forbidden fruit, their imortal lives ended. They died. Perhaps in a spiritual sense as well, but their physical immortality their life up to that point ended.
That is not scriptural or logical.
If immortal, why was the tree of life there?
Who was it for? Not the animals or they would have ate of it.
God is also not shown as taking away their immortality. Get the quote if you have one. He is seen as locking away the tree of life and effectively murdering A & E by intentional neglect and abuse.
You say (perhaps) died in a spiritual way. Don't you know?
I think that they were spiritually fine and so does God when he says they became like him and developed a moral sense.
Would you not eat as well or would you deny yourself a moral sense to the point of stupidly not knowing you are naked and not being able to reproduce?
Regards
DL
