RE: Why was Adam exempt from the transgression when the transgression was disobedience?
September 17, 2014 at 5:40 pm
(This post was last modified: September 17, 2014 at 5:56 pm by Thumpalumpacus.)
(September 16, 2014 at 5:06 pm)Greatest I am Wrote: Indeed.
But what is the first duty of one who has seized it, if mot to insure that all enjoy the same freedom of thought and action?
When a monk takes a vow of silence, should I force him to speak, so that he may use the freedom of speech?
Since you didn't answer my question, I will ask it again: if a woman voluntarily accepts a subservient position based on her religious faith, what should I do to fix that problem?
(September 16, 2014 at 5:06 pm)Greatest I am Wrote: For evil to grow etc. , my friend.
Regards
DL
The unquestioned assumption in your repetition of this adage is that because I am not doing as you prescribe, I am doing nothing. That is clearly not the case, as a closer rereading of the very post you quoted will show.
(September 17, 2014 at 2:54 pm)Greatest I am Wrote: 1. A rock
2. A water molecule
3. The number 2
A friend was rock bolting a room when one rock that he poked just ahead of himself broke loose and buried the room he was bolting.
He thought that that rock was quite good for having dropped just ahead of him instead of on him.
A water molecule that becomes the carrier of the Ebola virus, to name one of many, is not what we would call a good water molecule.
The number 2 as an answer to what is 5 - 4 is hardly good.
Now tell us again just what else is not in that tree of the knowledge of almost everything.
If you wish to give it some actual thought this time, try again.
Regards
DL
Don't look now, but you're mounting an argument supporting moral relativity.
