RE: Why was Adam exempt from the transgression when the transgression was disobedience?
September 24, 2014 at 11:48 am
(This post was last modified: September 24, 2014 at 11:52 am by Cyberman.)
(September 24, 2014 at 11:32 am)Bibliofagus Wrote: Maybe it would have went better if god would have introduced the snake as 'dangerous' instead of as a 'helper'?I doubt it would have made much difference. They were so gullible, they didn't even think to question the existence, let alone the integrity, of literally the second talking entity they'd ever met (and the first of the subsequently created ones). Especially when it was giving them information 100% at odds with what they'd been told by a source they had no reason yet to doubt. Not even a "hey, God, could we have a quick word? We've just been chatting to this talking snake and it seems either it's lying or you are. Any chance of a ruling on this?"
Quite frankly, at this point A&E deserve to be scammed.
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
