(September 25, 2014 at 11:14 am)Madness20 Wrote: For sure there's alot of arbitrary definitions of god that might be refutable, but that doesn't mean that refutal of arbitrary definitions trully refutes the possibility of existence.
True.
But without evidence, what is the justification to believe in a god?
Very few atheists claim to know, with absolute certainty, that a god does not exist.
Quote:The thing is, there are very compelling sets of reasoning to believe on an eternal and creating existence that serves as a cosmological hypothesis to explain the universe.
Like what?
Hopefully you are not referring to any of the philosophical arguments for the existence of a god, like the Cosmological argument.
They are all flawed.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.
