(September 25, 2014 at 10:24 pm)Rhythm Wrote: "Not p" tells me that the god -of this argument- does not exist. While some god may, not the one described by this argument. Would you agree to that?
No, I would not.
(September 25, 2014 at 10:24 pm)Rhythm Wrote: The god who exists -because/if- ants are 5 feet tall...simply does not exist...as ants are not 5 feet tall. If that's the condition offered.....then what else can I conclude?
That it's not necessarily true.
I don't know how to put it any more plainly. Concluding the inverse of what is asserted is a formal fallacy, and has been since antiquity. It's trivial to demonstrate the fallacy. Read http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Denying_the_antecedent
