RE: Evidence for atheism
September 26, 2014 at 4:48 am
(This post was last modified: September 26, 2014 at 4:49 am by fr0d0.)
(September 25, 2014 at 9:55 am)Mister Agenda Wrote: That they don't have a single good argument (one that stands up to reasonable scrutiny) on their side is evidence that atheism is the more logical position.
(September 25, 2014 at 10:04 am)robvalue Wrote: That too
That's why I see the deflection so often, they often won't answer a direct question, but just go off on some irrelevancy. Just like a politician.
If there was a god and some way of proving it (a) we'd have seen the evidence by now and (b) they wouldn't have to use ridiculous logical and semantic contortions to get there. I wonder, are they trying to convince us, or themselves?
I find it interesting that from my point of view it seems exactly the opposite