(October 3, 2014 at 2:56 pm)Drich Wrote: Nothing you have provided here in the way of 'evidence' is verifiable. Most of which have been quoted from an unknown source. Did you not notice how I quoted from verifiable sources in that when i provided you with a source you could click on a link and follow to the surce material I quoted. As for the source material itself it varys from the president's own personal historical foundation, a website dedicated to the perservation and compliation of such data or someother source that can be checked on.
Why is that? are you not aware that such information if true can be multisourced? Only oneside commentary has to be sole sourced from some deep dark dank volume of some book no one has ever heard of.
If you want to have this discussion then please use the resources provided by the internet, quote them and leave links, so we can have a proper discussion.
Because right now in all you had to say, can be dismissed as a fallacy of false authority.
You apparently didn't actually read the post, because many of those have attributions.
The rest are easy to look up.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
