RE: First birth from womb transplant
October 4, 2014 at 6:36 pm
(This post was last modified: October 4, 2014 at 6:58 pm by Anomalocaris.)
(October 4, 2014 at 4:26 pm)Chad32 Wrote: I don't think I've heard of women being born without a womb. I have heard of some weird things happening, though, so it's likely not the weirdest thing ever.
It is called Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome. It is relatively common amongst severe congenital defects. There are probably fifty to a hundred thousand American women who suffer from it.
(October 4, 2014 at 6:02 pm)TaraJo Wrote:(October 4, 2014 at 3:39 pm)Aoi Magi Wrote: I am wondering how long before these becomes the least of concerns of religious leaders, and becomes the major headache of governments dealing with over-population.
Fortunately, the places that have the technological resources to pull off a womb transplant aren't the places where the population is booming. While the world is over-populated, the problem areas tend to be the third world nations where the only resource is argriculture and the more children you have, the more people you have to tend the land.
Although Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome is common for a severe genetic defect, it is not common enough so that curing it would significantly effect overall birth rate.
In any case, price of major organ transplant show no sign of coming within reach of most of the third world. Also, since woman are not usually born with spare uterus like they are with a spare kidney, it seems likely the supply of transplantable uterus would always be tight.