I'm brought to mind of the idea of holography. Not the idea that the universe is a hologram, but the study and creation of holograms we're all familiar with.
When you see the "film" of a hologram, it is unintelligible as an image. It's a jumbled mess of dark and light spots. When you shine the proper light on or through it, the image appears. So the correct light is needed to "decode" the information on the film. Shining a laser of the wrong frequency will not yield the original image due to improper cancellation. You need the set-up of the original laser, with its frequency and intensity, to reproduce the original conditions for a true representation of the object.
The different lasers could be looked at as different perspectives. The jumbled film could be looked at as objects in their natural state. And the holographic image could be looked at as the representation of objects rendered in the brain.
Interestingly, you need the laser to recreate the image, but you also need it to create the film.
This is all metaphorical and doesn't do us any good, I realize, but I thought it was interesting. Haha I apologize for adding nonsense here.
When you see the "film" of a hologram, it is unintelligible as an image. It's a jumbled mess of dark and light spots. When you shine the proper light on or through it, the image appears. So the correct light is needed to "decode" the information on the film. Shining a laser of the wrong frequency will not yield the original image due to improper cancellation. You need the set-up of the original laser, with its frequency and intensity, to reproduce the original conditions for a true representation of the object.
The different lasers could be looked at as different perspectives. The jumbled film could be looked at as objects in their natural state. And the holographic image could be looked at as the representation of objects rendered in the brain.
Interestingly, you need the laser to recreate the image, but you also need it to create the film.
This is all metaphorical and doesn't do us any good, I realize, but I thought it was interesting. Haha I apologize for adding nonsense here.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
