Transcendental Knowledge?

[One Above All]

It means (forgive my repeated quotations), a judgement that "rests not merely on experience but on the conditions of the entire possibility of experience which lie within us. For the judgement is determined precisely by that which determines experience itself, that is either by the forms of space and time intuitively perceived by us a priori, or by the law of causality known to us a priori. Examples of such judgments are propositions such as: two straight lines do not enclose a space.--Nothing happens without a cause.--3x7=21.--Matter can neither come into existence or pass way." They transcend knowledge only in the sense that (according to this author) they're truths (like logical axioms) that exist independent of experience, are required for experience, and we have an intuitive understanding of them (on which empirically true statements depend).

...I have no idea what the hell you just said. I think I'd rather read the wall of text.

Seriously, can't people whose regularly employed vocabulary contains words such as "transcendental" be clear about anything?