An Argument Against Supernatural Causation

[fr0d0]

I pointed out a fallacy in your reasoning, I did not address the content of your premises. There is a difference, you know. I certainly did not urge you to make a case for the non-materialism of god. So please address the subject of my statement if you are in denial of it.

Seems simple to me Rabbit: You're making assumptions based on materialism of a non material subject.

---

You should at least try and demonstrate that the concept of non-materialism is coherent. Also, are you saying that the argument presupposes materialism, and is therefore weak, or that it argues in favour of materialism and is therefore weak? I wasn't entirely sure.

Yes I'm saying it presupposes materialism where none is presented.