RE: An Argument Against Supernatural Causation
July 3, 2010 at 4:51 pm
(This post was last modified: July 3, 2010 at 4:56 pm by fr0d0.)
(July 3, 2010 at 2:58 pm)Purple Rabbit Wrote:You dismiss the "existence of the supernatural" because there is not "a shred of evidence" (+1) making it "futile to fabulate about" because you "could fabulate a surplus of quadrazillion irrelevant supernatural alternatives" "but would have no clue on what basis to choose one" (+2)(July 3, 2010 at 2:50 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:So where exactly in this quote do you see me making assumptions based on materialism of a non material subject?(July 3, 2010 at 2:35 pm)Purple Rabbit Wrote: Where is that exactly?
(June 29, 2010 at 2:04 pm)Purple Rabbit Wrote: You're right, we can't rule out the existence of the supernatural. But when we have not a shred of evidence to look that way, it is futile to fabulate about it. For, given the time to do so, I could fabulate a surplus of quadrazillion irrelevant supernatural alternatives, but would have no clue on what basis to choose one.
Twice there?

