(October 30, 2014 at 2:35 am)whateverist Wrote: Does masturbation require a rationalization? If you wanna, go ahead. If not, lets eat.
I'm thinking of responses to largely theistic statements that masturbation is bad or wrong because it's a sin or whatever other justifications they use.
It very well could be an appeal to nature rather than a naturalistic fallacy, I guess I'm not that knowledgeable about the difference. Is the appeal to nature not fallacious?
And, yes, Beccs beat you to it. :p
(October 30, 2014 at 6:46 am)pocaracas Wrote: It seems you were practically right.
As always... as should be expected of a smart person.
Thanks, but the bolded part is a little inflated, methinks; sometime I'll have to tell you about the incredibly stupid argument I had with my best friend about Indiana Jones. I was not a smart person during that argument.
Quote:your place, tonight, I see!
Ironically, I just finished making dinner again. Maybe I won't be eating alone...
Teenaged X-Files obsession + Bermuda Triangle episode + Self-led school research project = Atheist.