(November 1, 2014 at 6:04 pm)MysticKnight Wrote:(November 1, 2014 at 5:47 pm)Chas Wrote: You can not justify that assertion. If it exists then either it or its effects are detectable.
If we know the soul exists, then it's effects are detectable, but it's effects would be us. We are the Soul. We can see ourselves. Seeing your a soul or not seeing your a soul is not up to scientific debate. If we don't have knowledge we are a soul, scientific method says nothing about it. And if we do have knowledge, it says nothing about that.
(November 1, 2014 at 5:51 pm)Stimbo Wrote: Indeed. We have no way at present to detect gravity (afaik), yet we infer the force by its effects and label it gravity. Do the same for gods of any flavour and we will never have these sorts of discussions again, while someone will walk away with the biggest Nobel Prize in history.
Your non-existence (creation) showing existence (God). You are the effect of God emitting his own existence to being. If you can't witness yourself being a spiritual emission, then it's not the fault of God. This something a lot people become aware of through reflection. Mystics of all type of faiths talk about it. And it's a witnessed effect of God.
Lots and lots of word salad. Would you like some pepper on that?
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
