(November 1, 2014 at 8:53 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:(November 1, 2014 at 6:23 pm)Chas Wrote: What? ISIS has been condemned by some Muslim leaders; ISIS has condemned nothing.
That was me mis-typing, obviously; if you peruse the link you'll garner the point, despite my error.
You did read the link ... right?
(November 1, 2014 at 6:23 pm)Chas Wrote: I think your gross misreading of your own link above demonstrates your confirmation bias.
It obviously wasn't a "misreading", I was multitasking and mistyped. I trust that you can read the intent of the post, and not flog what is an obvious typo.
Clearly, the moderates in that link condemned the brutalities performed in Iraq and Syria.
(November 1, 2014 at 6:23 pm)Chas Wrote: They claim that sobriquet for themselves. So, there's that.
Yes, and he put that into a reply to me, so I felt the need to clear up any confusion. Is there a problem with me making clear that I don't buy that line of bullshit?
I am happy to hear that, but your 'obvious typo' was anything but obvious.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.