You're very confused Brian.
My statement, which you mocked, was about all of maths. You can't change the criteria without accepting non physical evidence as possible.
You don't give me the right to believe? Really??? I'll assume that was a typo.
What I believe changes nothing from your point of view. You don't understand what I believe, is all you can accurately say. You can't say what I believe is nonsense without providing good reason.
So with good reason I say to you:
You have the right to claim the Yankees won the Superbowl, and can claim it until the cows come home and until you are blue in the face. It still would not change the fact that the Yankees play baseball and not football.
You're point of view is provably that nonsensical. Do you see the difference? You can't prove that I'm wrong. Saying something without being able to prove it is what you're accusing others of, but you're the number one offender.
My statement, which you mocked, was about all of maths. You can't change the criteria without accepting non physical evidence as possible.
You don't give me the right to believe? Really??? I'll assume that was a typo.
What I believe changes nothing from your point of view. You don't understand what I believe, is all you can accurately say. You can't say what I believe is nonsense without providing good reason.
So with good reason I say to you:
You have the right to claim the Yankees won the Superbowl, and can claim it until the cows come home and until you are blue in the face. It still would not change the fact that the Yankees play baseball and not football.
You're point of view is provably that nonsensical. Do you see the difference? You can't prove that I'm wrong. Saying something without being able to prove it is what you're accusing others of, but you're the number one offender.
