(November 2, 2014 at 1:13 pm)fr0d0 Wrote:Modern science did suggest that whatever verifiable scientific info is in that book seems rubbish, and how most of it doesn't match historical or geographical records, and how yet other portions are not possible based on what we know about reality, all the while ignoring the fact that those who made the claim that the book is true didn't provide any evidence of it being true whatsoever.(November 2, 2014 at 11:47 am)Brian37 Wrote: I am not the one basing my "point of view" on an old book written in antiquity by humans who had no clue of modern science.
A book who's subject isn't science. Yeah. And which modern science has no comment on.
Brian, you are the worst kind of fundie.
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu
Join me on atheistforums Slack
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f64b6/f64b635e6a0d2b1c1a264b8bbe19ba9d97c588ed" alt="Cool Shades Cool Shades"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92868/92868735cdaa5f3c6a32c0fa84134c16065ead08" alt="Tongue Tongue"