RE: Why do atheists deny that they are just biorobots?
November 4, 2014 at 6:54 pm
(This post was last modified: November 4, 2014 at 6:55 pm by Chas.)
(November 3, 2014 at 5:04 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: Truly, I believe you’re reaching. You cannot honestly believe that atheism doesn’t affect subsequent inquiry. Ruling out options, like divine influence over physical reality, is one such philosophical consequence.
Nope, wrong again, Chad.
An agnostic atheist (most of us here) does not deny the possible existence of gods, merely the utter lack of evidence for any.
So, when investigating physical reality, there is no presupposition. If evidence of divine influence is found, then that would be acknowledged. Yes, honestly.
Skepticism is not a position; it is an approach to claims.
Science is not a subject, but a method.
Science is not a subject, but a method.