For Creationists.

[Esquilax]

Intelligent manipulation, that's not evolution it how ever does point toward God.

GC

Artificial selection is just as valid an evolutionary process as natural selection. Evolution describes gene change over generations, with no requirement that the source of that be purely natural.

These experiments have been ongoing for how long?
A hundred years maybe?
Trying (by application of intellect -NOT chance) to cross the genetic limits of
"AFTER THEIR KIND" (or within each kind of biological critter) To NO avail.

"Kind" is not a scientific term, and it has no set definition. Additionally, it's not a part of the definition of evolution; objecting to evolution on the basis of kinds is completely irrelevant, akin to objecting to gravity on the basis that gravity does not account for the color pink. If you wish to continue this line of argument honestly, do us the courtesy of doing something no creationist has ever done, and present a concrete definition of "kind" before using the term in your argument, though even if you do that it doesn't suddenly make it relevant or applicable to evolution.

Additionally, "scientists haven't been able to do X, therefore X is impossible naturally" is a category error, and an argument from ignorance. Double fallacy.