For Creationists.

[Chas]

There's no way you can prove what happens in a lab can be possible in nature.

Of course we can, by replicating the conditions in nature.

You are always digging at me for proof now it's your turn.
So, you're saying that before science got involved with gene manipulation, there was another intelligence involved in gene manipulation.

Where did he say that?

There is no proof that any plant or animal has become something completely different, there is no proof that new DNA can be added without human interference.

GC

Yes, there is on both counts. The fossil record and DNA demonstrate this.
And have you never heard of mutation?

---

Well, this has truly evolved (the kind of evolution I can believe in).

I was asked about "Kinds", the word and concept predates the culture of evolution by several hundred years.
Lately, the naturalists are confused by what it means.

When you go to get an ice cream, you are asked what KIND you want.
You specify vanilla and you do not get chocolate.

Neither do they become one or the other over millions of years.
If you have a dog, you might be asked what KIND of dog you have?
Pretty simple isn't it.
The genetic code is what? Silly putty?

Please shut the fuck up until you've learned some science.