Quote:Oh, you're an atheist.
When you define God as "creator of the universe" then yes. There is no way to get that definition though, which is what I meant by it should not be defined. I should have said "it cannot be defined," at least not in the same convention as everything else in the universe. God should not be an exception. Whether or not there is a creator is irrelevant since this attribute was derived from nothing but mere speculation, making it meaningless.
Quote:The easter bunny can't be disproved. Maybe we just haven't found him yet. Maybe this is all a dream and in fact in the real reality we're all bunnies that just love the Easter holidays! This cannot be disproved either. But it can be defined as can God be defined as some "being" that created "the universe" since we know that a being just means an entity of some kind whether human-like or not... the universe - well, we all know what that means its in the dictionary. And likewise to such a being "creating" the universe.
Well, certain aspects of the Easter Bunny can be disproved. For example, the discovery that parents hide the eggs, not the bunny, is a good illustration of how being more specific allows for a clearer, outright rejection. As I have said before, we need a system which sorts out belief from reality, and we must rely on falsifiable evidence. I'm not saying we should entertain all possibilities, I am saying the assumption that all possibilities are true (or reasonable) is absurd--the only possibilities that should be entertained are those we can verify.
Live and love life
![[Image: KnightBanner.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i31.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fc386%2FJudas_Iscariot_X8792%2FKnightBanner.png)
Liberty and justice for all
![[Image: KnightBanner.png]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i31.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fc386%2FJudas_Iscariot_X8792%2FKnightBanner.png)
Liberty and justice for all