RE: Is Obama a President or King?
November 24, 2014 at 1:14 pm
(This post was last modified: November 24, 2014 at 1:34 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(November 21, 2014 at 8:21 pm)A Theist Wrote:(November 21, 2014 at 6:53 pm)Minimalist Wrote: You see, Woodie thinks when republicunts issue executive orders they are upholding the constitution but when black democrats do it they are 'kings.'
You really have to dismiss morons like him.
I'm really glad to hear that you're a fair and open minded guy who's not a racist prick like everyone else you accuse whenever they disagree with you. I'm sure you'll join me in voting for Lt. Col. Allen West and former Secretary of State, Dr. Condoleeza Rice for President and Vice President in 2016...West and Condi, 2016!
I'm rather fond of Condi, but she seems to sincerely not want back in the White House. West seems sketchy. I don't foresee a world in which Condi would agree to be his running mate, or why she should settle for less than President if she's suddenly interested.
(November 21, 2014 at 9:08 pm)Heywood Wrote:(November 21, 2014 at 8:42 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Your explanations are as vapid as you are, Woodie. Grow the fuck up. Everyone is on to you.
If my explanation is wrong then you should be able to show why it is wrong. The fact that you cannot is evidence that my explanation is right or that you are just too much of a moron to cogently explain why it is wrong.
Which is it dummy?
Most of your explanations seem to amount to 'look around the thread until you see where I addressed this before'.
(November 21, 2014 at 9:42 pm)Heywood Wrote: I would not vote for Condi...dummy.
I was being sarcastic to show how stupid liberals are when they claim the right hates Obama because he is black.
You seem to have a pattern of trying to show how liberals don't take the high road by avoiding it yourself. Messaging tip: snark isn't your strong point.
(November 22, 2014 at 9:53 am)whateverist Wrote: No, it is how your party works. Democrats don't go out of their way to make your party look good. But they would never balk at voting for what they perceive as being in the country's best interest just because the republicans were supporting it. Only your party is that corrupt.
Funny, I seem to remember George W. being for an immigration reform bill that's not that much different from what President Obama is pushing, only the Democrats blocked it. And I remember Nixon trying to establish a negative income tax that would have guaranteed poor people some kind of income, but the Democrats blocked it. In both cases the motivation seemed to be to not let a Republican president score points on one of 'their' issues. It's easy to look virtuous when people's memories are short. Until George W. Bush, Republicans had a reputation in the last century for not getting us into wars, now getting us into wars is something both parties can agree on because they're both led by neocons.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.