Wouldn't that suggest some mental disability or imbalance?
I see that you clarified this as a practical definition; a way to use a person's actions as an indicator that they should be locked up or treated (I agree), but does this mean they are bad?
I mean, what else would describe a bad person? Maybe somebody who acknowledges the ability to feel remorse, guilt, and empathy, but admits to practicing the suppression of these feelings in order to commit more appalling crimes? This seems absurd. Too many stars would need to align, but what else would make a safe categorization? A bot fly? That's a bad person.
I see that you clarified this as a practical definition; a way to use a person's actions as an indicator that they should be locked up or treated (I agree), but does this mean they are bad?
I mean, what else would describe a bad person? Maybe somebody who acknowledges the ability to feel remorse, guilt, and empathy, but admits to practicing the suppression of these feelings in order to commit more appalling crimes? This seems absurd. Too many stars would need to align, but what else would make a safe categorization? A bot fly? That's a bad person.
I can't remember where this verse is from, I think it got removed from canon:
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
"I don't hang around with mostly men because I'm gay. It's because men are better than women. Better trained, better equipped...better. Just better! I'm not gay."
For context, this is the previous verse:
"Hi Jesus" -robvalue
