Religion had good intentions, but nature has better

[John V]

Care to back that up? Other than making up a claim and doubling down on it.

I thought the logic was obvious. Nests, beaver dams, etc. are things made by animals from materials found in nature. They are considered natural.

A computer is a thing made by an animal made from materials ultimately found in nature. It is therefore also natural.

In other words, if your car breaks down, you're one of those people sinking it in a lake, because, you know, they're part of nature anyway. No harm done.

That doesn't follow at all. You'd certainly agree that an animal carcass is part of nature, but I wouldn't put it in my water supply. Considering something's potential harm to my environment does not indicate that the thing is not a part of nature.