RE: 13 doctrines of radical Islam and ISIS
December 3, 2014 at 2:30 pm
(This post was last modified: December 3, 2014 at 2:32 pm by Mister Agenda.)
(December 3, 2014 at 9:20 am)Hoopington Wrote: "Maturity Age" - Which for that paedo you call a prophet, was 6 years old.
So, you're a Sunni? If you were a Shi'a, you'd have her at least 17, maybe in her early twenties...definitely older than Mary when God is supposed to have knocked her up.
(December 3, 2014 at 9:20 am)Hoopington Wrote: Now, as you have ably demonstrated, there isn't a single age defined....just loose fluffy bollocks that can be interpreted in pretty much any way the reader chooses.
Do you think it would be an improvement if it said 'six'? We WANT Muslims to interpret Qu'ran verses according to the standards of modernity, don't we?
(December 3, 2014 at 9:20 am)Hoopington Wrote: Then we come onto the bit of Islam I particularly hate......Muhammed is the role model, the man all of you pathetic sheep aspire to. Anything he does is right and correct, isn't that so?
The Q'uran tells us Aisha was 6 when they married......6.
No, the Qu'ran does NOT tell us Aisha's age when they married.
(December 3, 2014 at 9:20 am)Hoopington Wrote: Which means that the vast majority of Muslims believe it to be absolutely fine.
Because they're Sunnis, not because they're Muslims. The Sunnis had a political interest in making Aisha out to be young so it would seem more miraculous that the teachings of Islam were transmitted through her instead of the heir to Mohammed the Shi'a claim.
(December 3, 2014 at 9:20 am)Hoopington Wrote: I know, as I work in East London, which has a massive muslim community.
And all Muslims everywhere believe the same things as the Muslims you know, eh?
(December 3, 2014 at 9:20 am)Hoopington Wrote: I work in a team of 8, 3 are Muslim. I have asked about Aisha and whether Muhammed was wrong to each of them......an awkward silence is the best answer I've got, followed by a pretty rapid change of subject. These are good, decent people by the way.
How can they be good, decent people if they believe a 'pedophile prophet' (your words) was perfect and should be emulated? It's almost like their beliefs aren't so easily summarized, isn't it?
(December 3, 2014 at 9:20 am)Hoopington Wrote: You're indoctrinated, so cannot see, but your religion, above all others, contains lessons that are now considered evil.
Have none of you people ever read the Old Testament?
(December 3, 2014 at 9:20 am)Hoopington Wrote: As such, evil acts and occurrences are accepted as normal and common place by those who follow that putrid, disgusting religion.
Yes, the state of the Middle East and our troubles with it have nothing to do with the great Western Powers treating the region the way a honey badger treats a beehive. The state of affairs has nothing to do with our military support for the main purveyor of Wahabbism, toppling legitimate secular governments and replacing them with Western puppets, or dividing up the region as we saw fit in the first place. If only Islam hadn't been invented, they'd be Orthodox Christians and we'd all be friends and they would have been glad to let us run their countries in the way most convenient to our oil interests. History has nothing to do with it, it's all that execrable religion!
(December 3, 2014 at 2:06 pm)Minimalist Wrote:Quote:They are misinterpretations of those verses. From the first to the last.
You are right.
Yet the bombs keep going off.
Those bombs? They're mostly ours.
I'm not anti-Christian. I'm anti-stupid.