Critique Time!

[Godscreated]

[quote='Godschild' pid='813928' dateline='1418115578']

---

Really, what about dark matter, can't be touched, be smelled, be seen. None of the physical attributes you demand of God, yet you accept it without question. I've heard the argument that we can observe the effects it has on other things, I've said the same about God, yet dark matter is all you accept. Until I can see it touch it and smell it I want believe it, that's close to what atheist say about God, right.

---

A scientist who makes claims about dark matter will make his observations known and explain how and why he came to that conclusion.

I've done that here, with God.

His work can then be investigated and researched by others, who might add to it or even reject it, and they must show their work as well.

My testimony was and is open to investigation and research, no one hear has done either, why? I think indifference. Now let me get this straight, when one scientist makes a claim and gives his supposed truth, it is then the other scientists responsibility to prove the first right or wrong, right. Then why is this not afforded to Christians and what we claim. We make a claim and give our results, we ask to see it disproved and the same atheist reaction comes, it's up to the claimant to prove, this is not so with how you described scientist and their claims.

That allows more and more people to check the work and either begin to build a workable theory or dismiss it as invalid. No one "accepts it without question." On the contrary, it continues to be questioned. That is how our knowledge of the universe improves.

Yet atheist do not do this when a Christian makes a claim here. The most recited answer we get,"you're wrong. That sound like the way to disprove what we claim.

Claims about god are all over the map; there are many different gods, and many different versions of the same gods. People can make claims about how they "detect" or "experience" god, but those claims cannot be researched or confirmed because there is no standard method for doing so.

This can be said about scientific claims as well.

And accepting or rejecting dark matter has no effect on my life in general, since I'm not a theoretical physicist. It's just information and potential knowledge. I can take it or leave it. I don't think you see god in the same way. Don't you think it's crazy that there is a much more rigorous path for claims about dark matter than there is for claims about god?

Well it does mine, if it's true a new part of creation has been found, if not then I am tempted to believe it's a way scientist want to disprove creation, which really makes no sense. Isn't discovery just that, no matte how something came about.
Yes I think so, people just reject God, no rigorous searching, yes I've heard what's been said here and every story is the same, just some little difference but, he basic story is the same. If there was rigorous searching wouldn't you expect the stories to widely vary, whoever if there was a single influence you would find the stories to be the same, so a single influence is a rational determination.

GC