(December 11, 2014 at 11:41 pm)ChadWooters Wrote: My post made no emotional appeal of any kind. It was confined to strictly biological facts. You can legitimately disagree with my conclusions based on the facts I presented. But frankly the way you are doing it is itself emotionally charged. Name-calling is the tactic of a bully.
What is the biological fact of a statement relying upon assertions of "natural law" or "natural order"? Cite peer-reviewed biological studies establishing the existence of either of these things as you have presented them.
Quote:A homosexual bigot would be prejudiced against homosexuals as human beings. In contrast to this, I am against the practice of all forms of fornication, sodomy and adultery regardless of sexual orientation.
A person who wasn't a homosexual bigot wouldn't presume to tell another person that it is wrong to love and enjoy physical pleasure with someone because you personally think it is disgusting.
Trying to cite "natural law" doesn't automatically erase the hate and disgust for homosexuals, as human beings, that is patently obvious in every word you type on the subject. You may convince yourself, and you may convince others that are as hateful as you are, but that's as effective as that tactic gets.
