(December 27, 2014 at 2:43 pm)whateverist Wrote: And unnecessary. There must be plenty of nits to pick without challenging the label. All any atheist is saying is no, so far as I can tell, I don't believe in whatever it is you're calling gods.
OK, so what I would call God you would call not-god.
To wit: You have three choices, either you know as gnostic, you do not know as agnostic and then there is the believer in between.
From here the believer can be enlightened or impoverished and that would be on a slippery slope somewhere between these opposites.
