(January 5, 2015 at 4:34 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote:(January 4, 2015 at 8:58 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: I like how you assume modern roads, roads have existed for thousands of years.
It's called an analogy, but, please go ahead and explain how roads work.
In your opnion, how similar or not similar is this to your lack of understanding of what secularism is?
How about we acknowledge your inability to understand a very simple concept, this is the third time I'm repeating myself.
Secularism as you put it, may be neutral or "indifferent" to religion by definition but not in practice. For instance, the first amendment guarantees the free exercise of religion, yet we have children being disciplined for exercising their right.
Boy Suspended from School For Reading Bible During Recess
Student suspended for saying ‘bless you’ at school
Not to mention the law in France that bans wearing religious symbols in schools.
French law on secularity and conspicuous religious symbols in schools
Being "neutral" would mean banning all symbols...
None of the above acts affect government policy in any way, proving there is a clear agenda (if it's not an atheist agenda, then who?) against the public exercise of religion.
How is this being neutral or "indifferent" towards religion?
