(January 5, 2015 at 1:05 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(January 5, 2015 at 4:34 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: In your opnion, how similar or not similar is this to your lack of understanding of what secularism is?
How about we acknowledge your inability to understand a very simple concept, this is the third time I'm repeating myself.
Secularism as you put it, may be neutral or "indifferent" to religion by definition but not in practice. For instance, the first amendment guarantees the free exercise of religion, yet we have children being disciplined for exercising their right.
Boy Suspended from School For Reading Bible During Recess
Student suspended for saying ‘bless you’ at school
Not to mention the law in France that bans wearing religious symbols in schools.
French law on secularity and conspicuous religious symbols in schools
Being "neutral" would mean banning all symbols...
None of the above acts affect government policy in any way, proving there is a clear agenda (if it's not an atheist agenda, then who?) against the public exercise of religion.
How is this being neutral or "indifferent" towards religion?
They have those laws to keep people fighting over which religion is true if it wasn't banned on a constant basis children would start fighting to the death over my religion is better than yours or my god is stronger than yours.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>