RE: Je ne suis pas Charlie Hebdo
January 11, 2015 at 8:45 pm
(This post was last modified: January 11, 2015 at 8:47 pm by Drich.)
(January 11, 2015 at 12:25 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote:(January 11, 2015 at 10:22 am)Drich Wrote: A dozen of the sharpest satirical minds could not refute the arguements of just two wantobe stoner pizza delivery boy/rappers.
This is an idiotic reading of the events. The two murderers tyook up arms precisely because they could not refute the points made by the cartoonists; murder was the only way they could answer the critiques.
Violence is not an argument. Violence is the way assholes end an argument.
That's exactly my point sport!
These two are using a tactic that you nor your buddies are able to respond to.
So why not place them in front of those are are equipt to speak to them on a level they can understand? Maybe someone who wants to have that type of conversation.
(January 11, 2015 at 3:51 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote:(January 10, 2015 at 9:57 pm)Drich Wrote: i spoke of the carrot you speak of the stick, but either way it is a rewards program. Now ask yourself with a violent religion why does a given soceity allow it?
Did you actually make this assessment thinking it didn't 100% apply to you and your religion?
What makes you think that?
I am not a fan of radical religion of any brand.
