Why we believe

[robvalue]

Don't have no singularity? Was that an intentional double negative? I'm confused. Sure, my terminology may be way off, I haven't studied it in a lot of detail.

---

GH: We won't find arguments disrespectful, that's a very unlikely thing here, as long as they are not just a giant ad hominem attack. (Anyone is welcome to disagree as always, I don't ever mean to preach on the board's behalf, just going by my experience.) From an atheist point of view, we are discussing entirely imaginary concepts. So no matter what pieces you put on the board, and when, it's all just a game to us in that respect.

I think the point is that if you have decided that every argument you make must necessarily lead to a certain conclusion, or else you have formed it wrong, then that shows innate bias and is likely to produce logical fallacies.