RE: WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER...
January 15, 2015 at 3:51 am
(This post was last modified: January 15, 2015 at 4:27 am by Fidel_Castronaut.)
You're arguing against something you don't understand, which is painfully obvious to everyone reading this thread. You can't just add 'it's coincidental' to your argument as though that suddenly absolves you of the utter tripe you've posted thus far on this thread, mate. It's ridiculous. I could talk to you about things like nominal ascription in religious/political demographics but it would go over your head. Also I could talk (Again) about how religious adherence has nothing to do with secularism, but that too is a very easy to understand point you've failed to get.
Keep on embarrassing yourself, though, it's funny. I want everyone to read this exchange and get as many chuckles as I have. So pass this thread around nappies if you can, please.
I put it to you that you can't define secularism because you don't know what it is. So, what, -10 now nappies? How low can you go?
Keep on embarrassing yourself, though, it's funny. I want everyone to read this exchange and get as many chuckles as I have. So pass this thread around nappies if you can, please.
I put it to you that you can't define secularism because you don't know what it is. So, what, -10 now nappies? How low can you go?
![[Image: 146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i629.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fuu13%2FRXM843%2F146748944129044_zpsomrzyn3d.gif)
