(January 15, 2015 at 11:30 am)Fidel_Castronaut Wrote: I could say yes and indiciate that secular structures do not need to be codified or indeed entrenched that that state can still nominally endorse a religion whilst being entirely secular in operations (like the UK), but you wouldn't understand it.
If the state endorses a religion it is NOT secular, it seems that you're the one who doesn't. have a clue.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secularity
Quote:Secularity (adjective form secular, from Latin saecularis meaning "worldly" or "temporal") is the state of being separate from religion, or not being exclusively allied with or against any particular religion
Quote:A related term, secularism, is the principle that government institutions and their representatives should remain separate from religious institutions, their beliefs, and their dignitaries. Most businesses and corporations, and some governments, are secular organizations.
