WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER...

[Thumpalumpacus]

SMH, again with the irrelevant topics. Like I said, a tactic straight out of Fidel's book. In case you missed it, the discussion was about whether or not secular societies tended to be happier, do you agree or disagree?

In case you missed, you're not even understanding how you're wrong. The difference between "secular" and "atheist" is crucial to this discussion -- yet you've demonstrated repeatedly that you not only do not understand that difference, you refuse to educate yourself about it. As a result, you're citing a shallow poll without understanding that you're buttressing your interlocutor's argument. These aren't irrelevancies; these are your misunderstandings which lie at the core of why you're wrong, but I don't expect you to get that.

As for my opinion on secular societies being happier, that seems to be the case.

Actually you should be going the other direction and proclaiming my genius, because basically, all your saying is that your argument was destroyed by an idiot....

It's funny how you think you've "destroyed" an argument because you've found one minor error which was quickly owned ... while at the same time you've lashed yourself to the anchor of a large body of ignorance and are shouting victory ... even as you go under.

I do have to hand it to Rhythm though, he is the first and only Atheist on this forum I've seen admit they were wrong.

This simply underlines the fact that you're either not reading my posts, or you're too stupid to understand the English language. Look at the second sentence of my post #167 in this thread, numbnuts, and this time read for comprehension ... assuming you can actually do that, of course.

Just concede defeat and move on dude...

Demonstrate your point, and I'll consider it, depending on the quality of your argumentation.

I won't lie, I'd be surprised if you managed to manufacture a cogent point, much less argue it successfully. You don't strike me as terribly bright.