RE: What came first, the atheist or the theist?
August 4, 2010 at 9:33 pm
(This post was last modified: August 4, 2010 at 9:33 pm by TheDarkestOfAngels.)
(August 4, 2010 at 9:27 pm)fr0d0 Wrote: You backed up what I said TheDarkestOfAngels. Yes it (non empirical evidence) doesn't prove anything. It is still non empirical evidence and clearly a form of evidence.
It isn't evidence by it's own definition.
Not-evidence is not a form of evidence.
You may as well be attempting to convince me that a not-language is a language and a not-computer is a computer or some form of language or some form of computer.
It's utter nonsense.