RE: Creation/evolution3
January 17, 2015 at 9:27 am
(This post was last modified: January 17, 2015 at 9:31 am by Drich.)
(January 17, 2015 at 5:33 am)BrianSoddingBoru4 Wrote: Why is it important to distance this theory from Gap creation theory?? Because it combines the unmolested Genesis account AS RECORDED IN THE BIBLE, with the evolutionary data we have discovered and can not other wise reconcile. Without Adding anything to scripture or taking anything away. This also explains several other creation "paradoxes" that atheist tend to use to disprove the genesis account. Since - as you say - the Genesis account is irreconcilable with biological evolution, what is the point of muddying things up with creationist idiocy?
I know you have the atheist handicap of only seeing what supports your position so I will politely just point out that in the highlighted section of text you posted I intentionally use the phrase "can not otherwise reconcile."
This mean the theory I used does indeed reconcile the two accounts with each other.
Quote: We have gobs of evidence for descent with modification and for speciation, we have no evidence whatsoever for ANY creationist position.again, with my theory everything 'science' has in the way of evidence then becomes evidence for creation as the two accounts become one.
Quote:Since evolution explains what we need it to explain, and since the Genesis account explains nothing, what you're trying to do is akin to saying, 'My car runs on petrol, but here's why I think there are pixies in my engine.'If I use the word pixie to accurately describe something in my engine then I'm not wrong. I'm just not using the terms the engineers use. As I work in a related industry, I can say this sort of thing happens all the time.
Boru
(January 17, 2015 at 6:21 am)Parkers Tan Wrote:(January 16, 2015 at 9:49 am)Drich Wrote: Bottom line of this theory is that the bible doesn't provide a time line between the last day of creation and the day of the fall of man. The rest is indeed speculation and how it all COULD have worked out. But in the end with no given time line between the end of the seven days of creation and the day of the fall of man. The whole fossil record could be accounted for.
No. The bottom line is that you worship a god you say dishes out cancer in order to force people to worship him. You worship a god who you allege meted out the death sentence to every human being in history for the "sins" of the first two. You worship a god you demands collective punishment, the murder of innocents, and will forgive the worst evils i exchange for a promise of worship. You worship a god claiming to be perfectly merciful, yet created hell. You worship a god who acknowledges having created evil, but who refuses to take responsibility for such an evil act.
That is the bottom line. This horseshit about how many days passed between creation and the day your god sentenced every human to death for the "sins" of two of them, is, well, horseshit.
I'd advise you to stop shoveling it.
Where have I said any of the things you claim mr red herring? Do try and stay on point old sport.