Just some rubbish, but this is MY God's gospel, so READ or you will be d---ned

[downbeatplumb]

In the 18th Century (around then) The Germans, God bless them, started something called textual criticism, they stripped down a lot of things in the Bible, including the resurrection of Jesus. It was concluded that Jesus did not rise from the dead and anyone who did believe that was basing their ides on faith not any evidence, however after World War 2 it was reopened, 'Did Jesus arise from the dead?' Now most theologians and some scholars believe Jesus did rise from the dead, purely by evidence and zero faith, it is the only logical thing to conclude.

That statement is rather bold. Dark ages? really?

Evidence that jesus was resurrected like........what exactly?

There is no conclusive evidence that jesus existed in the first place so the likelyhood that there is anything like proof of resurrection is frankly zero.

And even if there were somehow proof of him walking around after his crucifiction, well he wasnt crucified for very long, (according to the texts),when you look at the normal length of time time it took people to die on the cross, so was he actually killed? If I saw some one walking around after theyd been declared dead I would suspect an error in diagnosis not a miracle.

I would want to see the medical records and the qualifications of the dr.

I like evidence with my facts how 'bout you.