Creation/evolution3

[Esquilax]

Why would I need to admit that the Genesis account is allegorical if it's plausible and works along side the evolutionary account?

Okay, so first of all, the Genesis account is not plausible in any respect, and it won't be until you can establish that creation ex nihilo and supernatural beings are possible, let alone extant. For something to be plausible, it needs be possible first; possibility is a necessary condition for plausibility. What you're doing here isn't just putting the cart before the horse, it's setting the cart up before the horse is even born.

Second of all, you have an extremely broad definition of "works," if your sole basis for what works is that it isn't directly ruled out by the bible.

God seems to love using the painfully obvious and foolishly simple to show up the learned and the wise of this world.

Well, at least we both agree that you're foolishly simple. That's something.

How much more obvious and simple can it get that because their is no timeline between the end of a literal 7 day creation and the fall of man, that the whole scientific account could have taken place?

How much more obvious and simple can it get that because "it doesn't not say that!" isn't positive evidence for a thing, your continued assertions and breathtakingly arrogant presentation just makes you look like an enormous, dripping bell end?