(January 26, 2015 at 10:23 am)Rhythm Wrote: I suppose that would also explain why none of those deportees seem to have survived long enough to leave a single trace of their passage eh?
What does a camping trip look like after 4000 years of sand blasting errosion look like in your opinion?
The desert has completely consumed entire cities that were are just now able to find due to satalite imagery and the cities foundational remains...
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/11/09/...es_sahara/
If you read the artical you will note that these cities are no where near as old as the time of the exodus.
So again, what is left after 4000 years of a soceity who did not build any permenate structures and had to use, and reuse EVERYTHING till it wound up in the fire or discentgrated?
I am not say their isn't anything out there, I am saying they were not a soceity who built anything we are looking to find and they were not a throwaway soceity meaning their 'trash' foot print would be very small compared to say a Army of the same size marching across the desert..
Speaking of which in History there are many many Large armies from the greeks to the Romans who have march across those deserts, where is the 'evidence' to support the hundreds of thousands of men animals and equipment that say Alexander the Great use to conquor the 'known world?'
Quote:Your own better nature betrays you constantly. Your extra biblical fairy tale betrays your stated schtick.Sorry to pee on your rant, but someone has to put out your little rant before it gets out of hand.
My 'Schtick' Simply says the Bible does not record a time line between the last day of Creation and the Morning of the Fall of Man. This means it is possible that ALL OF EVOLUTION could have happened in that time.
Which is COMPLETELY consistant with what the bible does indeed say.
Let's first admit this, and then we can look on to other aspects of my theory.