Creation/evolution3

[Drich]

Sooo... What? You think the chicken came first?

No, I think you're a dismissive arsehole with no idea what you're talking about and an ego as wide as your unwillingness to do even the smallest bit of research into the topics you've decided you know about.

As to the chicken and the egg topic, it's a continuum, not a simplistic single generation problem. The realistic answer, given within the context of how evolution actually works, is that the chicken and the egg came first, or rather neither did, over a band of time on the avian reproductive timeline comprising multiple generations, each one more chicken-like than the last.

But, you know, that kind of answer requires a little bit of research into biology, so it's not surprising that you didn't know it. I await your baseless, arrogant roflol emote, though. That won't be predictable at all.

Uhhh. No.

At some point a non-chicken (albeit very close to a chicken) layed an egg that contained the first full on chicken.

I completely get this is a very slow and deliberate process that makes tiny changes over vast periods of time. However like it or not The chicken was a mutation from it's former 'choke-un' counterpart (This is what I'm calling whatever preceeded the chicken in the evolutionary chain) As some point the Choke-un laid an egg, and that egg contained what 'science' in all it's wisdom would identify as a chicken.

I also get that you don't like how flipant I am with your version of God/science. to which I say, so what. How is this any different then what you all say/Do against My God?

If I am wrong, then like I do with you provide BCV via one of your bibles and show me where I am wrong. otherwise pound sand, because theoritical science is barly science at all, and the fact that you all are so quick to marry it to real pratical science should speak volumes to you on it's legitimacy.