WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER...

[Huggy Bear]

And what does this explain exactly?

You've already had the difference between atheism and secularism explained to you several times. You've also had the importance of that distinction explained to you.

What else do you want explained? The difference between secularism and Communism? Oh, wait -- that's already been explained to you, as well. The reason why government doesn't always, or even regularly, represent the socio-cultural views of an entire nation? Been there, done that, bought the coffee cup.

Looks to me like the only explanation needed here is what the fuck you were doing in English class ... 'cause you sure as hell weren't paying attention, to judge from the comprehension skills you're displaying here.

Look muppet,

Speaking of reading comprehension, That quote was questioning Fidels reference to post #208 as an answer to this post.

---

Not throwing a tantrum, just pointing out the hypocrisy.
considering i made this post on page 27, i hardly see how it's relevant to go back to page 8.
https://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-p...#pid848245

You're seriously delusional.
This is a clear example of the mindset of an atheist, If you won't accept that Denmark's government is in fact NOT secular which is easily provable, how are you going to even begin to discuss spiritual matters?

Your own quote (in bold for clarity)
https://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-p...#pid835049

so according to YOU, secularism prevents a state mandated religion.
This link is taken from your own post.
https://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-p...#pid846133
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_Denmark

Also according to YOU secularism "gives people the ability to chose a religion (or no-religion) without the state choosing for them"
This link is also taken from your exact same post
https://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-p...#pid846133
http://www.trincoll.edu/depts/csrpl/rinv...enmark.htm
Need I go on?
Denmark clearly does not have separation between church and state, yet you fail to acknowledge your own evidence proving this fact.

You're contradicting yourself dude.

I can't wait to hear your next excuse....

If you notice, those are quotes taken from your own post, no need to go back and read, I took the time to find your definition of secularism and quote them along with the link.

as you can plainly see, you contradict yourself by claiming that Denmark is secular, I WANT YOU TO ADDRESS THE CONTRADICTION which you have not done, but avoid the issue like a child.

Just man up and admit you were wrong, I would have dropped it a long time ago.

Jeez

---

Since you're the resident genius here, why don't you explain how this post

Nah...I'm too lazy to flip back a few pages~

... I'd rather redefine "back-pedal" so that it has a meaning amenable to my point.

is relevant to anything I said.

Also, to point out a fallacy in your argument.
https://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-p...#pid846415

Secular countries are neutral towards religion. Atheist countries obviously aren't neutral towards religion. I'm not sure the source of your difficulty in understanding this basic difference.

You state that "Atheist countries obviously aren't neutral towards religion", But that would then mean that religious countries obviously aren't neutral to things A-religious, correct?

But you guys are quick to point out that Panama/Paraguay are close to 100% religious yet have a secular government.

Paraguay is a religious country and a secular nation.

Is it your position that an Atheist country cant have a secular government?