WELCOME TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER...

[Huggy Bear]

Look muppet,[...]

lol, you're funny when you're butthurt.

Since you're the resident genius here, why don't you explain how this post
is relevant to anything I said.

I'd rather let you go back through the thread and find your own mistakes. I think that would be an edifying exercise for you, because you clearly need practice identifying the hidden premises in your own argumentation, so that you can learn to avoid retreating over bridges you've already burnt.

All that's a fancy way of saying think for yourself. No one else, especially me, is going to let you off easy.

Or it's dodging the question, spin it however you like.

Also, to point out a fallacy in your argument.
https://atheistforums.org/thread-30615-p...#pid846415

You state that "Atheist countries obviously aren't neutral towards religion", But that would then mean that religious countries obviously aren't neutral to things A-religious, correct?

Not necessarily, no. A religious country might have no formal opinion about gasoline vs diesel power for public transport.

You could say that same for an atheist country.
This is a dad analogy, because gas vs diesel is not an issue central to either sides ideals. A better example would be opinions on divorce, adultery, or state sanctioned churches.
But I see you Dodged, the question again, which was "Is it your position that an Atheist country cant have a secular government?"