(January 27, 2015 at 1:12 am)Huggy74 Wrote:(January 27, 2015 at 12:39 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: lol, you're funny when you're butthurt.Or it's dodging the question, spin it however you like.
I'd rather let you go back through the thread and find your own mistakes. I think that would be an edifying exercise for you, because you clearly need practice identifying the hidden premises in your own argumentation, so that you can learn to avoid retreating over bridges you've already burnt.
All that's a fancy way of saying think for yourself. No one else, especially me, is going to let you off easy.
(January 27, 2015 at 12:39 am)Parkers Tan Wrote: Not necessarily, no. A religious country might have no formal opinion about gasoline vs diesel power for public transport.You could say that same for an atheist country.
This is a dad analogy, because gas vs diesel is not an issue central to either sides ideals. A better example would be opinions on divorce, adultery, or state sanctioned churches.
But I see you Dodged, the question again, which was "Is it your position that an Atheist country cant have a secular government?"
Depends on what you mean by "Atheist country", If your talking about state atheism then no obviously the government wouldn't be secular as a secular government would be neutral in matters of religion. If your talking about a country where the population identifies as atheist then sure the government could be pretty much anything.